Advanced Tennis Technique Development For All Levels Of Players

Video your game to see your strokes

Hotels to stay in when you are off to tournaments!

Compare hotel prices and find the best deal -

A great tennis book!

I knew Bob Harmon. Yes, he wrote this book years ago, but it still applies. Among Bob's pupils was World No. 1, Jack Kramer. Bob gave him lessons when Jack was still world number 1. This is a great book for you, and, as you can see, it is a real bargain.

The best coaches are in America

Natives of the following countries are not eligible to apply for the visa lottery because those countries sent more than 50,000 immigrants to the U.S. in the previous five years: BANGLADESH, BRAZIL, CANADA, CHINA (mainland-born), COLOMBIA, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, ECUADOR, EL SALVADOR, GUATEMALA, HAITI, INDIA, JAMAICA, MEXICO, PAKISTAN, PERU, PHILIPPINES, SOUTH KOREA, UNITED KINGDOM (except Northern Ireland) and its dependent territories, and VIETNAM.

All other countries, including Singapore, are eligible - which increases the odds of winning for those countries.

Click for information on US Visa Lottery

Win the USA Visa Lottery!

For a Step By Step Guide For entering the Green Card Lottery and Successfully Passing The US Embassy Interview. This Ebook Is Written In Plain English And Lists Tips For Increasing Your Chances Of Winning A Green Card. Avoid scams. Immediate Download!

Click here for information!!

If Federer and Nadal are still winning something must be seriously wrong with tennis

Marat Safin interview:

Marat Safin at the US Open in 2009

Marat Safin at the US Open in 2009 (coming to net)

Marat Safin fears for the future of tennis with a lack of new stars coming through Getty

Eight years of retirement from tennis and six years working as a Russian MP have done nothing to dampen the fire that has always burned inside Marat Safin. At the age of 37 the former world No 1 is in London this week to play in Champions Tennis at the Royal Albert Hall, which will be his first on-court appearance outside Asia since he entered politics in 2011.

Put it to Safin that not much has changed in tennis since he retired at the end of 2009 – when Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray occupied the top four places in the world rankings – and the former US Open and Australian Open champion does not sound too impressed.

“If Federer and Nadal are still winning I think there’s something wrong,” Safin said as he sat back in a courtside seat at the Albert Hall before the start of play on Thursday. “I don’t see any upcoming superstars today.”

You can see his point. For all the talk of new generations breaking through, Federer (now aged 36), Nadal (31), Djokovic (30), Murray (30) and Stan Wawrinka (32) have won 49 of the 51 Grand Slam tournaments that have been played since Safin won the Australian Open in 2005. Juan Martin del Potro and Marin Cilic have been the only interlopers.

“I’m not saying that our times were the best, but when I was growing up, players were winning ATP tournaments at 16, 17, 18,” Safin said. “Now players are only just starting to be pros at the age of 25. I don’t know why that is.

“Players used to retire by the time they got to 30. At 32 you were a dinosaur. Now you see players who are still running at the age of 38. The upcoming young guys just aren’t at a high enough level. If you can still manage to run at the age of 38 and still be No 1 in the world, it means there must be something wrong with the other players.”

What about the young Russians Andrey Rublev, Karen Khachanov and Daniil Medvedev, who have all made significant breakthroughs in the last year or two?

“They’re talented, but to go from being a talented player to a top 10 player is like going from here to the moon,” Safin said. “It needs a lot of work and it’s not just about hitting the ball on the court. You have to do work off the court. There’s the psychology, strategy, tactics. They need to work a lot because they have a lot of ups and downs. Rublev, Khachanov – they win one tournament and then they don’t win a match for six months.”

There are some young players Safin admires – he singles out Nick Kyrgios – but the Russian questions how far they might go in the sport. “If you want to be a really good pro you need to be beating Nadal and Federer now,” he said. “Look at Murray and Djokovic. They were beating the top players when they were 19 or 20, but you just don’t see that from the younger players today.”

He added: “Federer and Nadal are great players but they’re getting older. No matter how much you work in the gym, it becomes harder and harder to recover match after match. Age catches up with you.”

Dinara Safina

Dinara Safina was also ranked No. 1

Safin, who will play his opening match against Xavier Malisse on Friday, looks in good shape considering the years he spent away from tennis. He has been working harder on his fitness since stepping down as an MP this summer and recently spent time training with his sister, Dinara Safina, another former world No 1, in Monte Carlo.

“We decided to do fitness and tennis together, just like the good old days,” Safin said. “We wanted to see how long we could manage that. We did 10 days and it was fun. It was basically meditation – concentrating on what you were doing but only on that. Because otherwise you have too many thoughts in the head and it gets tiring.”

After Safin was elected to the Duma as a representative of Vladimir Putin’s United Russia party in 2011, almost the only time he found for tennis was when he played in the International Premier Tennis League in Asia.

“I took some years off tennis because I got a bit burned-out in the head,” Safin said. “I had too much tennis in my life so I decided to quit a little bit. Now, slowly, I’m starting to enjoy it again. It helps you to keep your body in good shape. As you get older that’s important.

“I let myself go a bit. A couple of years ago I was a bit overweight. In my job I was sitting down all the time and I had no time to do any exercise. But then I started to play ice hockey twice a week and I also started running every day.”

Safin is hoping to play more tennis next year and would eventually like to coach, though he insists he is not ready for that yet.

“I also want to start my own business, but not in tennis,” he added. “I’ve got some thoughts about that and I’m getting some people together and then we’ll start. I couldn’t do it while I was a government official. Now my hands are freer. That’s why I want to travel, play tennis and do business.”

What was the best part of being an MP? “I liked having to think outside of the box,” he said. “Once you’ve been a tennis player, to then dedicate yourself to a completely different profession, especially working as a government official, that’s a big change. I took a chance and I’m happy about it. I know how the system works. I got so much information and knowledge that I would not have got from anyone else.”

Did tennis help to prepare him for life as an MP? “Yes, because it gives you mental toughness,” Safin said. “It’s very important to start to think from scratch. If you’ve been a ‘superstar’ tennis player and you start to do something else and you think you’re still a tennis player, you’re in big trouble. You need to take your ego away and start from zero.”

Editor’s note: Maybe it’s because none of the younger players are coming forward to the net?

The Importance of Serve-and-Volley

Roger Federer’s Serve

The art of the serve-and-volley, many tennis experts argue, has no place in today’s game. It is a common refrain that the speed of the courts, modern string technology and even the size of the athletes have made that style of play obsolete.

It’s outdated, they say, a relic of a bygone era that was left behind as the game evolved.

An examination of the statistics, however, shows that serving and volleying remains a winning strategy.

At the 2012 United States Open, the official tournament statistics broke down points in three categories: baseline, net, and serve-and-volley.

The average percentage of baseline points won for men during the tournament was 46.2 percent; for women, it was was 47.3 percent.

Getting to the net was more successful. Men had a winning percentage of 66 percent when approaching; women were won 65.7 percent.

But both men and women had the highest winning percentage when serving and volleying: 68.7 percent for men, 69.2 percent for women.

The numbers were similar at Wimbledon last year, when men won 68.3 percent of their serve-and-volley points and women won 67.8 percent. Still, there were only 190 serve-and-volley points in the women’s tournament, and only 37 of the 128 women in the field served and volleyed at all. But 19 women did not lose a point while serving and volleying.

In the men’s draw, 102 of 128 players attempted the tactic at least once, and 92 won at least 50 percent of their serve-and-volley points. Twenty-eight men won 100 percent of their serve-and-volley points.

Last year at Wimbledon, Sergiy Stakhovsky served and volleyed on every one of his 109 first-serve points when he upset Roger Federer in the second round.

If serving and volleying delivers the highest winning percentage, why isn’t it more common?

The primary force in the demise of the serve and volley has been a misguided mentality that it does not work anymore. At tennis academies across the United States, coaches are reluctant to teach it to young players.

At every level of the sport, serving and volleying is shunned, and it shouldn’t be. At the very least, it is an effective secondary tactic that keeps the returner guessing about the server’s intentions and stops the returner from floating high, defensive shots back into play.

But it can also be a lot more than a secondary tactic. Rajeev Ram, then ranked 272nd, when he defeated No. 59 Grigor Dimitrov, 6-4, 6-4, in the opening round in Atlanta. Ram served and volleyed 38 times in the match and won 34 of those points.

He had been told he could not serve and volley anymore, even though he was skilled at it. He recommitted to serving and volley and by July 2012, he was ranked 93rd.

Last year at Wimbledon, Sergiy Stakhovsky served and volleyed on every one of his 109 first-serve points when he upset Roger Federer in the second round. He also served and volleyed on 41 percent of his second serves, winning 69 percent of those points.

“Well, you can’t really keep up with Roger on grass on baseline rallies,” Stakhovsky said after the match. “It’s just impossible. He feels the grass. He feels the slice. He can do whatever he wants with the ball. The only tactics I have is press as hard as I can on my serve and come in as much as I can. The shorter it is, the less rhythm he got.”

Federer agreed. “He was uncomfortable to play against,” he said. “I think he served and volleyed really well. It was difficult to get into that much rhythm, clearly, against a player like that.”

Men’s finals at Wimbledon used to regularly feature hundreds of serve-and-volley points. In every men’s final at Wimbledon in the last 10 years, there have not been 150 serve-and-volley points combined. The numbers are even worse on the women’s side. From 2000 to 2013, 10 women’s finals did not feature a single serve-and-volley point.

As Wimbledon kicks off for another year, look for the players bold enough to serve and volley. The odds will be on their side.

Take note that the two best players in the world, Federer and Nadal, are always moving forward—just watch!